Be circumspect in your comments against the judiciary – Kofi Abotsi warns

Dr Ernest Kofi Abotsi, the Dean, Faculty of Law of the University of Professional Studies Accra (UPSA) has urged the political class to be circumspect in their utterances and accusations against the judicial arm of government.

According to him, allegations without evidence levelled against judges could destroy public confidence in the judiciary which could subsequently lead to conflict and chaos.


Read full article/>
“I will urge our political class to be circumspect in their pronouncement [against the judiciary] because the court generally survives on confidence in their work. Therefore, if there is an allegation, particularly one which is not established but is thrown out there, the prospect that this can create not only suspicion in the minds of people but actually [undermine] the mandate and the legitimacy of the court,” Dr Abotsi said in a Joy News interview monitored by GhanaWeb.

He added: “In many countries that fell victim to civil wars, the starting point was to bastardise the court. Once you bastardise the court, people think that there is no avenue for resolution so they fight on the streets. I think we should be very careful [about] the extent to which we bastardise our Court.”

Dr Ernest Kofi Abotsi’s comments come after Mohammed-Mubarak Muntaka, the Asawase MP, alleged that a Supreme Court judge tried to bribe one of his colleague MPs to vote for Prof. Aaron Mike Oquaye in the recent election of Speaker of the 8th Parliament.

“So shamefully, a Supreme Court Judge calls a colleague lady, telling her what they will give her. She has children, they will help her take care of her children. She can take fuel from a filling station for the four years,” Muntaka alleged.

These allegations, Dr. Abotsi indicated, do not only affect [the] work of the judiciary but threaten the peace and stability of the whole nation.

“Look, people have all kinds of suspicions and allegations, but saying things, particularly, when you are a Member of Parliament, should demand a certain level of responsibility because a lot of people follow you.”

“I do not know the factual basis on which the statement was made, but once the statement is not being submitted to a particular forum for investigation and once the details of this are not being mentioned then what you do is that you literally put and cast the entire court in doubts and [it] creeps question marks on the minds of every justice of the court and this is not good enough.”