CDD's anti-LGBTQ+ survey influenced by international donors - Sam George

Sam George is sponsoring a bill against LGBTQ+ activities in Ghana

Many CSOs are against the bill

Sam George has indicated that their opposition is because they are being sponsored

Sam Nartey George, Member of Parliament (MP), Ningo-Prampram and Lead Sponsor for the Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, has dismissed a survey by the Centre

Read full article.for Democratic Development (CDD-Ghana) on the passage of the Proper Sexual Rights and Ghanaian Family Values Bill.

According to the findings of the survey, CDD indicated that, there will be a grimmer outlook for Ghana’s economy should Parliament pass the Bill.

“By this Bill, we have added economic conditionality on ourselves [as a country] when we go out to seek support. Ghana’s budget regularly relies on grants of about 4 to 6 percent each year from donor partners who are mostly against this Bill as we know,” the CDD research said.

But speaking on Joy FM’s ‘Top Story’ programme on Tuesday, Sam Nartey George dismissed the findings of CDD stating that, they were borne out of influences from international donor support agencies due to the funding inflows think-tanks receive for their work.

“The US Agency for International Development, Canadian International Development Agencies, the United Nations Development Programme, the German International Development Agency and the European Union fund the CDD and they are all pro-diversity and support LGBTQ+ activities. So, the CDD’s work is definitely influenced. He who pays the piper dictates the tune...if they are on the negativity of the bill and their funders and sponsors support the activity that the bill seeks to criminalise, it shouldn’t come as a surprise to you,” he stated.

Reacting to Sam George’s comment, Bernard Anabe, the Executive Director of ISODEC said, the funds from these agencies is not to push a particular agenda.

He explained further that it would be out of context to suggest that the funding from these agencies is to influence their actions since they similarly provide funding for the government as well.

“It is not to say that a particular donor is looking to push a certain angle but it will depend on CDD’s own principles and what they stand for as an organisation…They also fund the government and we are not going to say that because of one issue or the other, the funding that they give to government or other agency is wrong funding,” he retorted.

The Anti-LGBTQ+ Bill, since its introduction, has generated public debate from various stakeholders in the country.

While some Members of Parliament and religious bodies have advocated for the passage of the Bill, other civil society groups and academia have opposed it, stressing that it will violate human rights when passed in its current state.

Meanwhile, Parliament’s Constitutional and Legal Affairs Committee is set to resume its public hearing on the controversial document for further consideration.