'Crime is crime, stop patronising me' – Amidu descends on Mahama

Special Prosecutor, Martin Amidu, has said recent comments by former President John Dramani Mahama regarding the Office of the Special Prosecutor are needless and patronising.

Mr. Mahama said during an interview on Adom FM that if he wins the upcoming Presidential polls on December 7, he will not

Read full articleinterfere with the work of Mr. Amidu.

Mr. Mahama said Mr. Amidu’s role as Special Prosecutor was important in the fight against corruption, hence he will allow the OSP to continue to function since it was set up by an act of Parliament.

But issuing a stern warning in a press release, Mr. Amidu condemned the comments by the former President as patronising and a needless attempt to drag his office into partisan politics.

“It is…needless for anybody to assume airs about what she or he will do with the Office or Martin Amidu when she or he wins the elections. The Office is an independent statutory anti-corruption agency and must be respected as such notwithstanding who for the time being holds the Office of the Special Prosecutor.

“Crime is crime. There is no need trying to politicise the work of the Office and linking its fate with election results,” he stressed.

He said the pronouncements by Mr. Mahama constitute interference and may even be an attempt to influence the independent mandate of his Office to investigate and prosecute certain electoral offenses apportioned to his Office.

Read his full statement below. Read his full statement below.

STOP DRAGGING THE OFFICE OF THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR INTO PARTISAN POLITICS: BY MARTIN A. B.K. AMIDU, THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR

I have read with dismay the deliberate efforts by certain Presidential candidates for the 2020 Elections to drag the Office of the Special Prosecutor and the person of the Special Prosecutor, Martin Amidu, as he is referred to in their speeches and media publications, into their campaign rhetoric to demonstrate their determination to prevent and fight corruption as a reason why the electorate must consider them as the candidate of choice for the up-coming elections.

“I won’t sack Martin Amidu if I win – Mahama” was the banner headline on the Ghana Web Politics of Tuesday, 20th October 2020 with its source as Daily Mail. Then on the same Ghana Web General News of Tuesday, 20th October 2020 with the sources as Starr FM and Class FM, I read that: “I will warn my appointees against messing with Amidu – Mahama” and “I’ll warn my appointees against messing with Amidu, I won’ interfere with his work – Mahama”, respectively.

As the Special Prosecutor who personifies the Office of the Special Prosecutor, I find such statements patronizing, and needless within the objects, mandate and functions granted to the Office under the Office of the special Prosecutor Act, 2017 (Act 959).

These pronouncements constitute interferences with, and attempts to influence the independent mandate of this Office to investigate, and prosecute certain electoral offences apportioned to this Office under the law which constitute corruption and corruption-related offences as clearly stated in Section 79 of Act 959.

Any Ghanaian worthy of putting himself forward as Presidential candidate for the up-coming elections should know the content of the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2017 (Act 959) by now.

He must know by now that under section 4 of Act 959, except as otherwise provided for in the 1992 Constitution, the Office is not subject to the direction or control of a person or an authority in the performance of the functions of the Office even when the Office acts upon the authority of the Attorney- General to initiate and conduct the prosecution of corruption and corruption-related offences.

It is also clearly stated that the Board of the Office shall not interfere in the day to-day functions of the Office. This independence of the Office in the performance of the functions of the Office is reinforced when Act 959 gives the Special Prosecutor full authority and control over the investigation, initiation and conduct of proceedings under subsection (1) of section 3 which spells out the functions of the Office.

Every adult Ghanaian knows who sued the nominee for the Office of the Special Prosecutor in January 2018 even before he could be considered for approval by Parliament.

The record of proceedings and the media published the names of the cohort of lawyers who supported and argued the case against the Attorney-General and Martin Alamisi Amidu until Martin Alamisi Amidu’s name was struck out from the suit.

There is no reasonable Ghanaian who does not know those who condemned the Supreme Court’s decision in the media and continue to do so. The Supreme Court has settled the matter with its final and authoritative decision in favour of the Attorney-General.

Before the decision of the Supreme Court one could make statements of speculation about what one would allow the Office to do or not to do. The Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2017 (Act 959) as interpreted by the Supreme Court is not negotiable and nobody can mess with that Office unless the Special Prosecutor abdicates his independence and surrenders the functions of his Office to politicians.

As the Special Prosecutor I do not need assurances from anybody of leaving me in Office when she or he wins the elections. The Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2017 (959) governs the situation. In any case the position of Special Prosecutor is not one of servitude but of service.

It is, therefore, needless for anybody to assume airs about what she or he will do with the Office or Martin Amidu when she or he wins the elections. The Office is an independent statutory anti-corruption agency and must be respected as such notwithstanding who for the time being holds the Office of the Special Prosecutor.

Crime is crime. There is no need trying to politicize the work of the Office and linking its fate with election results. May be Ghanaians ought to revisit a few of the things I said on oath during my vetting for approval as Special Prosecutor by Parliament on 13th February 2018.

The following stands out and can either be read or listened to when one Google’s: “Thieves fear investigators they cannot influence”. I told Parliament, inter alia, that:

“Thieves fear experienced, credible and tested investigators whom they cannot influence. That is the way to reduce crime. When they know the investigator is very experienced, credible, and has the capacity to find wrong, they will not do it.

This country is not a milking cow. It is for the people of this country, particularly, the downtrodden, the poor ones. I am saying that that is my position, and it will be. I am saying that whether I am approved or not I will continue to fight for the people of this country.

….If you go and look at the agreements I reviewed, they will tell you, I say it as it is. This is not in the national interest and, therefore, don’t do it.”

I have a Constitutional right as a citizen of Ghana to continue my crusade against corruption whether as Special Prosecutor or a citizen of Ghana as I stated on oath to Parliament.

I do not need a public office to continue to fight corruption. I used to crusade against corruption more effectively before accepting to be appointed as the Special Prosecutor.

I do not need any patronage and I do not think the Office of the Special Prosecutor as an independent statutory anti-corruption agency needs one. My position at my vetting by Parliament is no different from what the Secretary General Antonio Guterres is reported to have said to the United Nations General Assembly in commemoration of the seventy-fifth anniversary of the United Nations: “Corruption is criminal, immoral and the ultimate betrayal of public trust.” I repeat: “This country is not a milking cow. It is for the people of this country, particularly, the downtrodden, the poor ones. I am saying that that is my position, and it will be” no matter who becomes the President of Ghana. Ghana First!