You are here: HomeNana Kay NewsArticle 103610
This blog is managed by the content creator and not GhanaWeb, its affiliates, or employees. Advertising on this blog requires a minimum of GH₵50 a week. Contact the blog owner with any queries.

Nana Kay News Blog of Wednesday, 31 May 2023

Source: Island Reporters

Supreme Court rules that Akufo-Addo’s appointment of an Acting Auditor-General was unconstitutional

The Supreme Court has determined that the appointment of an acting Auditor-General by President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo was unconstitutional.

Wednesday, May 31, the apex court issued its decision.

Recall that President Akufo-Addo appointed an acting Auditor-General after requesting that Mr. Daniel Domelevo take 123 days of accumulated annual leave on July 1, 2020.


According to a statement issued by the Presidency and signed by the Director of Communication, Eugene Arhin, on Monday, 29 June 2020, the decision to direct Mr. Domelevo to take his accumulated annual leave was based on Sections 20(1) and Labour Act, 2003 (Act 651), which apply to all workers, including public officeholders such as the Auditor-General.

According to the Act, a worker is entitled to 12 weeks of annual leave with complete pay for each year of continuous service. This benefit cannot be forfeited by either the employee or the employer.

Since his appointment as Auditor-General on December 30, 2016, Mr. Domelevo is reported to have used only nine of his accumulated 132 days of annual leave.


Prof. John Evans Atta Mills, the third president of the fourth republic, issued a directive on April 9, 2009, ordering the then-Auditor-General, Edward Duah Agyeman, to utilize his accumulated annual leave of approximately 264 working days.


"In directing the Auditor-General to take his accumulated 123 days of annual leave, President Akufo-Addo considered the precedent," the Jubilee House statement said.

In contrast, the government was prosecuted over this issue. The Office of the Attorney General was named as a defendant.

The plaintiffs, nine Civil Society Organisations (CSOs), sought the Supreme Court to determine that the President's directive was inconsistent with or contrary to the letter and spirit of Article 187(7)(a) of the Constitution of 1992.

The office of the Auditor-General and the acting Auditor-General, Johnson Akuamoah, were also named as defendants.