You are here: HomeNana Kay NewsArticle 103649
This blog is managed by the content creator and not GhanaWeb, its affiliates, or employees. Advertising on this blog requires a minimum of GH₵50 a week. Contact the blog owner with any queries.

Nana Kay News Blog of Wednesday, 31 May 2023

Source: Island Reporters

Supreme Court strikes out law that allowed government to impose restrictions during Covid-19 pandemic

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court declared unconstitutional the law that permitted the government to impose restrictions during the Covid-19 pandemic.

In 2020, the legislature enacted the Imposition of Restrictions Act to permit the imposition of the restrictions outlined in Article 21 of Ghana's 1992 constitution.

In the interest of defence, public safety, public health, or the provision of essential services, the aforementioned constitutional provisions permit restrictions to be placed on the movement or residence of any individual or group of individuals within Ghana.

This law authorized the government to issue a variety of instruments while health officials managed the Covivirus-19 pandemic.

This is the law that permitted the President, among other things, to restrict public gatherings, close schools, and impose guidelines for religious gatherings.


Kwadwo Appiagyei-Atua, a law professor and human rights advocate, and eight others took the government to the Supreme Court on the grounds that the law in question was unconstitutional.

He argued that it unlawfully authorized the President to unilaterally suspend fundamental human rights and freedoms in the whole or a portion of Ghana, excluding the special role of the Chief Justice and the Superior Court of Judicature in managing or regulating the suspension of fundamental human rights and freedoms in the whole or a portion of Ghana; and excluding the role of Parliament in managing or regulating the suspension of fundamental human rights and freedoms in the wholly or a portion of Ghana.

This view was supported by a seven-member tribunal presided over by Justice Jones Dotse.

The court determined that the Imposition of Restrictions Act is unconstitutional.


Therefore, he announced that the law is declared unconstitutional and null and invalid. On June 7, the court's complete reasons will be made available.

Jones Dotse, Nene Amegatcher, Nii Ashie Kotey, Lovelace Johnson, Amadu Tanko, Prof. Henrietta Mensah Bonsu, and Emmanuel Kulendi heard the case.